International HRM (comparing between 2 cantries) Essay

Inter matter HRM (comparing between 2 cantries) - Essay Example some other determinant of human resources function is the culture of the nation. Culture encompasses language, norms, customs and beliefs. Policy development needs to nonplus into consideration the values of the res publica such as individualism or collectivism. Many in the flying field of HRM argue that the function depends on organizational structure while proponents believe it is dependent on national culture. This paper presents a critique of the significance of national culture as an explanation for the difference in HRM practice between Australia and Korea based on individualism and uncertainty avoidance, which are contrasting national approaches to HRM. issue culture is a significant determinant of the nature of workplace relations and the human resource concern practices. In Australia, the culture of individualism is deeply rooted and raft usually focus on ain accomplishments rather than working to accompli sh tasks as a group. A person ascends the management hierarchy by dint of working hard to become the leader in terms of performance. This is different in Korea where individualism is minimal, and large number tend to focus on teamwork to accomplish their workplace tasks. Holbeche (2001) suggests that the determinant of the level of individualism is the economic salubrious being of a country. This suggestion is supported by Vance & Paik (2006) who view teamwork as the response to the need for people sharing a common problem trying to establish a solution. An example is when a country is confronted by a disaster. The government and stakeholders as well as individuals cooperate to ensure that they acquire the in demand(p) strength to cope with the disaster. When it is solved, people find no reason to remain together and each fellowship attends to other matters independently. In essence, Australia is one of the countries that have a thriving economy and therefore people may