'Sociologist Karl Marx\r'

'A Brief Introduction Mr. Jeff riddle April 29th, 2009 There are three study theories that depict how sociologists view the world. The theories are functionalist, remainder, and fundamental interaction theory. Each of these has its declare viewpoints of how hoi polloi call for hostelry, and how nine affects the people. Each theory has its own group of sociologist to go with it. The theory that a sociologist picks to back has an effect on how they do research and how they look at problems. Schaefer) The first base theory is Structural Functional Theory, or functionalism. Functionalism is adept of the oldest theories, and is still workd today. In functionalism society is made up of variant parts, and these parts guide together to relieve the society stable. Functionalism relies very much on the scientific method. By relying on the scientific method, the study of sociology can be notice in the same way one would view the physical world. (McClelland) In functionalism, co mpound is said to happen when pressure is confide on individuals by social structures.This is what is cognize as a macro theory. big theories work from the society downward, the society forces the people to change, not the people change society. The side by side(p) theory is conflict theory. In reverse to functionalism, when society exists in a soil of balance and stability, conflict theory says that society is better described as real in a state of uninterrupted fight and conflict betwixt devil groups. Conflict theory has been growing it popularity since the deeply 1960s.M both social and economical problems such as, complaisant rights movements, and political battles, have given bloom examples of the conflict between the two groups, reinforcing conflict theory. Marx says there is a constant struggle between the haves, and the have-nots. In a bourgeois society, groups interact in a foul way. (Schaefer) They do this by the more decently group exploiting the lower group in order to become more powerful. This is what causes the mental unsoundness in power. The next theory is Interactionist or Symbolic Interaction Perspective.This theory is several(predicate) from the other two because kind of of running(a) from the society down in a macro prospective, it works from the individual up, in a micro prospective. Interactionists focus on the subject of human life at a personal level instead of at a social level. An interactionist wishs to bonk what the person was feeling or how they were fazed by a particular situation. parliamentary procedure is made up of patterned and unionized interactions on personal basis. Because of this the research through by interactionists can be through at a face-to-face level also instead of focusing on the group or groups within society. McClelland) on the whole interactions and reactions between individuals figure the way society works. An interaction can be any contact; this includes all language and symbols. Thi s is because interactionists want to understand each individual in society, because understanding the individuals will show you how they shape society in the end. (McClelland) In conclusion, these contrasting theories give sociologist a basis to work from. They do play a major role in the way a sociologist conducts research, or gathers information in other ways.Not any of the three theories can be said to be correct in a whole, but sociologists can use all of them to better understand a situation and draw conclusions about it. The theories bear sociologists to develop different viewpoints and find the tendencies between them. References Berlin, Isaiah, and Alan Ryan. (1996). Karl Marx: His Life and Environment. New York: Oxford University Press. Schaefer, Richard T. (2008). Sociology. New York: McGraw-Hill. Stanford cyclopedia Of Philosophy. (2008). Karl Marx. http://www. laspositascollege. edu/library/cited_APA_examples. php#anchorInternet\r\n'