'Statistical Significance and Homemade Shampoo\r'

'A domain on Gugo and Okra as homespun Shampoo A Research Done by: Francine Faye A. Jumaquio Majaline Faye A. Tolentino Romer T. Nepumoceno Talavera National High School Talavera Nueva Ecija A Study on Gugo and Okra as a homemade Shampoo Claudine M. Lajara I-Rosal Introduction This study was conducted to influence the strength of a homemade shampoo out of the endemic Gugo, scientific name Entada phaseuoliodes and Okra, scientific name Abelomoschus Esculentus L. in fashioning divergent quality of blur stronger.\r\n 4 phases were done: level 1, the stop treatment; stagecoach 2, homemade shampoo compared to bind treatment; level 3, homemade shampoo compared to varied concentration of gugo and ladys-finger; and degree 4, where the acceptability of the homemade shampoo was determine in terms of liquifiedness, semi softness, and manageability. Statement of the Problem: Specific anyy, the researchers aimed to make the following questions: 1. Can gugo and gumbo soil be em ploy as raw material in devising shampoo? 2. How effective are gugo and okra on the tensile strength of the cop? 3. Which treatment is more than effective †treatments with greater concentration of okra han gugo or more gugo than okra? Procedure A. Preparation of Materials approximately 10,000 hair strands were gathered from iv respondents having different types of hair, ( frequent, and ironic, ethnic, curly). In each type of hair, 2020 strands were apply: 240 strands for peeing, okra, 10 pct gugo, and 100 percent gugo; 240 strands for seven brands of shampoo; one hundred twenty strands for gugo and okra; and 600 strands for 10 treatments with varied concentration of okra and gugo. Five hundred grams of gugo bark were poached in 70 ml of water for 30 transactions, and agonistical to extract the juice.\r\nThe decoction was placed in a bang-up bottle. To prepare okra decoction, 200 grams of okra fruits were boiled in 200 ml tap water for10 minutes. The cooked okra wa s masked for extraction and decoction was strained for the breeding of solution. The homemade shampoo was prepared from 50 ml gugo decoction and 50 ml okra decoction. A 58ml coco palm oil was added to the mixture and placed in an ear therefore pot. It was heated for 5 minutes and placed in a clean bottle. The homemade shampoo was because prepared into two frame-ups: impersonateup A and setup B. The treatment involves four type of hair (form, dry, ethnic, curly). apparatus A preaching |Gugo (ml) |Okra (ml) | |1 |50 |50 | |2 |40 |60 | |3 |30 |70 | |4 |20 |80 | |5 |10 |90 | Setup B Treatment |Gugo (ml) |Okra (ml) | |1 |50 |50 | |2 |60 |40 | |3 |70 |30 | |4 |80 |20 | |5 |90 |10 | B. Soaking Process and decision of the Hair Strength In phase 1, four treatments were prepared: • Treatment 1: water, • Treatment 2: Okra, • Treatment 3: 10 percent gugo, • Treatment 4: 100 percent gugo. These are the overlook treatments.\r\nSix wheels were pre pared and labeled as 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 minute, respectively. Sixty strands of normal hair were utilise and dissever into 10 strands. The hair strands were simultaneously crocked in the respective bowls with 100 ml tap water and were removed when the time shell out for each bowl had elapsed. Then they were rinsed separately. They were placed in clean sheets of paper labeled according to the aloofness of time they were soaked, (such as T1- water: 5 minutes; T2 †water: 10 minutes; and so on). The bowl used from the first treatment was washed soundly and were used again for the other treatments. The process was restate for treatments 2, 3, 4.\r\nTo determine the strength of the hair strands, a inauguration scale of measurement was used and five trials were done. From the 10 strands of normal hair, 5 strands from Treatment were tested. The hair strands were tied up to the spring scale at one end. A 15 cm length of the hair strands were keep between the spring scale and the weight. The weight was pull out until the hair snaps. The amount of force in atomic number 7 (I Newton = 100 grams) registered on the spring scale prior to the breaking of the hair was recorded and the add up result from the five trial was computed. The process was tell for treatments 2, 3, 4. Also the aforesaid(prenominal) process was done for ethnic, dry, and curly hair.\r\nIn the second phase, 480 strands from four hair types were used. verboten 480 strands, 120 strands of the hair were prepared for trial 1 and trial 2, using the homemade shampoo (gugo and okra). The equivalent single-valued function ion phase 1 was done for these treatments. In the third phase, 2,400 strands of hair were prepared from the four types of hair. protrude of 2,400 strands, 1,200 strands were used in setup A and some other 1,200 in set up B. Each set up has 5 treatments and 60 hair strands were divided into ten, and each 10 were soaked separately in six bowls labeled 5, 10, 15, 22, 25, and 3 minutes, respectively. The same procedure from the previous phases was done to determine the hair strength.\r\nIn the 4th phase, 20 female respondents, who had normal and dry hair were asked to apply Treatment 1 in setup A: 10 percent gugo + 90 percent okra. Most of their hairs were equal in length. The respondents treated their hair one by one. They annoyed their hair first and 20ml of this treatment was applied to the completed crown and was massaged on the scalp. aft(prenominal) 1 min. , the hair was rinsed thoroughly with tap water. A clean pass over was used to dry and comb their hair slowly. After 1 hour, the effect on the hair was observed using 1 to 4 scales. The following scales were used: |A. Softness |B. Smoothness |C.\r\nManageability | |1 †somewhat soft |1 †slightly smooth |1 †slightly yielding | |2 †fair soft |2 †fairly smooth |2 †fairly manageable | |3 †soft |3 †smooth |3 †manageable | |4 †in truth soft | 4 †very smooth |4 †very manageable | After having applied and observed the effect of treatment 1; treatments with 90% gugo + 10 % okra were used by the same respondents with the same procedure as of Set up A. Results, Discussion and closedown Phase 1: substantive comparison on the hair strength among the control treatments:\r\nThere was no of import difference on the hair strength, considering the different types of hair. However, the longer the longer the time each type of hair was soaked, the greater the hair strength. Among the four treatments in this phase, the hair strength when soaked in 10 %gugo, were the strongest musical composition water was the weakest. Phase 2: Significant comparison between homemade shampoo and control treatment: commonplace hair was significantly strongest compared to curly, dry and ethnic. Among the control treatment, hair strength was the strongest when soaked in treatment three: 10% gugo. Treatment 1: water was registered the weakest . It was also observed that as the alky time increased, the hair strength also increased.\r\nPhase 3: Significant comparison among homemade shampoo, control treatment, Setup A and Setup B: Normal hair was significantly stronger, curly hair was the weakest, while dry and ethnic hair were almost like to each other. 10% gugo registered the strongest hair strength, followed by okra, then okra and gugo. Together, these three treatments were significantly different from all other treatment. The longer the soaking time, the stronger the hair strength. Phase 4: Acceptability of treatments. For normal hair, the two treatments showed no significant differences in terms of smoothness, softness and manageability. The 90% gugo+ 10%okra treatment was fairly manageable and the 10% gugo + 90% okra treatment was manageable.\r\nFor dry hair, the two treatments showed no significant difference in terms of smoothness, softness. But there was a significant difference of manageability at 0. 5 luck leve l. Recommendations Based on the findings, the researcher recommends the following: 1. pulmonary tuberculosis okra as raw material for making shampoo; 2. Further study of the properties of the homemade shampoo to establish the effect on hair; 3. experience research must be conducted on the acceptability for other types of hair; 4. This research would provide learning to those who are interested in the production of this product. Bibliography Jumaquio, Francine Faye A. , et. al. , â€Å"A Feasibility Study of Gugo and Okra as homemade Shampoo”.\r\n'